In this case the the tenant rented an apartment in a three-unit building on in Chicago from August, 2005 to April, 2007. Tenant gave a $750 security deposit.
After move-out the landlord returned only $300, keeping the other $450 for alleged damages. No interest was paid on the security deposit.
Tenant had a letter sent to the landlord. Return of the $450 plus damages plus interest were demanded.
The landlord's attorneys wrote back claiming the building was owner-occupied during the tenancy, so the RLTO did not apply (under RLTO § 020).
The Tenant was confident the landlord didn't live at her 3-unit building when she did. Tenant filed suit for return of the $450.
At trial the Landlord presented his own, his brother's, and the Tenant's former neighbor's testimony that the Landlord had actually lived as the roommate of one of Tenant's neighbors in the building. Tenant presented a copy of the Landlord's mortgage from during her tenancy that said Landlord's address was somewhere else.
The judge found the building was not owner occupied, so the RLTO applied. Tenant was awarded damages under RLTO § 080(f) equal to two times the $750 security deposit; or $1,500, because Landlord violated RLTO § 080(a) by commingling and (c) by failing to pay interest. Tenant was also awarded the $750 deposit back, plus court costs and attorney fees.
CHICAGO SECURITY DEPOSIT LAW