|
Tenant v. Stonebridge Village
Illinois Renters' Rights Enforced
by Class Action
The putative class consists of
all similarly situated renters at a large 586-unit apartment
complex in Arlington Heights with six buildings.
The Tenant gave a $500 security
deposit and rented at the complex for 22 months. All rent was paid and
Tenant alleges the apartment was left in as good a condition as Tenant found it
at move-in, ordinary wear and tear excepted.
After move-out Tenant was
given a written statement by the landlord confirming that interest was
not paid or credited until the Tenant moved out after 22 months.
Based on Landlord's own
documentation, Tenant alleged the Landlord willfully failed or refused to pay
security deposit interest within 30 days from the end of each 12-month rental
period as required by the
Illinois
Security Deposit Interest
Act.
Tenant also alleged their security
deposit was withheld after move-out for purported "Carpet Replacement" and "Kilz
/ Double Coat Paint" without provision by the landlord of paid receipts,
in violation of the
Illinois Security
Deposit Return Act. Tenants in this case wrote the
landlord a letter inquiring "can you send us receipts from the work
you had done?" and still, Landlord allegedly refused to provide
them.
Instead Landlord demanded money from Tenant in excess of the deposit and
interest it refused to return.
Tenant seeks damages
equal to their full security deposit under the Interest Act; equal
to two-times their wrongfully withheld security deposit under the Return
Act, and return of withheld deposit itself, for themselves and all other
tenants who rented at the property after February 8, 2006.
The case still pends. If you have information about security deposit refunds or interest at
Stonebridge Village in Arlington Heights, contact
mark@depositlaw.com.

|