|
RLTO Summary Lease Break Case
This case was brought by two tenants at two buildings under the same Chicago
apartment management company which manages more than a dozen Lincoln
Park area buildings with over 1,000 units.
The tenants
alleged they and other renters got leases with summaries of
the Chicago Residential Landlord & Tenant Ordinance (RLTO) that didn't
come with (a) the current year's or past two years' security deposit
interest rates, or (b) required porch safety language, as required by
section 170
of the RLTO.
There is a $100 penalty plus costs and attorney fees for violating
section 170.
In this case, neither tenant rented at a building that actually had a
porch or deck, and the landlord did not take security deposits from tenants.
Nevertheless,
on October 10, 2008 the trial court denied
the landlord's motion to
dismiss the case. The court found no exception in the
plain language of
section 170 for
landlords who don't take deposits or have porches. Though the
landlord had vehemently opposed our termination of the tenant's lease,
and threatened collections, the court said they were wrong.
The porch safety language
is required by an amendment to the RLTO enacted in 2003. This
amendment was made in response to a
Lincoln Park porch collapse that
summer which killed 13 people. Our position remains that
including porch safety language is important, and the law.
The tenant plaintiff in this case
was allowed to have broken their lease legally on short notice under
section 170 of the
RLTO as well as collect penalty damages for the same violation.
This case has recently
settled on behalf of several thousand renters, without landlord admitting liability.
ALL LANDLORDS ARE PRESUMED NOT-LIABLE
UNTIL PROVEN LIABLE
|